Sure. AMP Cache sits on google.com. This article on Digiday is an example (see image in link).
https://ibb.co/tCds3tX
Think of it as a bit like what Apple News Plus is doing with article redirects to the Apple News app except that instead of leaving a browser context you stay in a browser context, but the original content publisher’s content is hosted on google.com.
Alex
-
________________________________
From: Theresa O'Connor <hober@apple.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 7, 2020 3:10:40 PM
To: Alex Cone <alex.cone@iabtechlab.com>
Cc: James Rosewell <james@51degrees.com>; public-privacy@w3.org <public-privacy@w3.org>
Subject: Re: mark your calendar - next call 15 October 2020 UTC 16
Hi Alex,
You wrote:
> Tess, I am interested how your proposal treats an AMP use case, given
> AMP's prevalence and the potential side effects of adopting your
> proposed language in browser rules meant to protect data and thereby a
> user's privacy.
I'm afraid I don't understand the question. AMP is a rather large
collection disparate pieces. Could you elaborate?