Re: Request for privacy review: WebXR Device API

I’m h happy to do so, since I’ve done previous reviews of the WebXR spec.

If anyone else is interested, happy to have a co-pilot too

> On Aug 7, 2020, at 2:00 PM, Christine Runnegar <runnegar@isoc.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi all.
> 
> Another privacy review request came in today. Is there anyone with a particular interest in taking point on the review for this one?
> 
> Christine
> 
>> Begin forwarded message:
>> 
>> From: Manish Goregaokar <manish@mozilla.com>
>> Subject: Request for privacy review: WebXR Device API
>> Date: August 7, 2020 at 12:11:37 PM PDT
>> To: public-privacy@w3.org
>> Cc: "immersive-web-chairs@w3.org" <immersive-web-chairs@w3.org>, Brandon Jones <bajones@google.com>, Manish Goregaokar <manish@mozilla.com>, Diane Hosfelt <avadacatavra@mozilla.com>
>> Resent-From: public-privacy@w3.org
>> 
>> Hi!
>> 
>> As we're nearing CR, we'd like to request a final privacy review for the WebXR Device API, as outlined in the W3C document review guide. The security and privacy considerations section of the specification can be found here, along with an explainer here.
>> 
>> We've had involvement from various people in the privacy and security space during spec development (including Diane, who I've cc'd), so hopefully there is not much left to review.
>> 
>> We'd appreciate it if y'all could have a look.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> -Manish Goregaokar
>> WebXR Editor
> 

Received on Friday, 7 August 2020 21:01:17 UTC