Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Privacy Interest Group (PING) (until 2019-08-04)

Hi Nick

> Jeffrey's proposal can be a good starting point for that, certainly, but I
> think this should work like the TAG's Design Principles - it's a living
> guidance document, and it should make it clear what is being assessed by
> the PING review process.  If new types of privacy concerns arise, they
> should be added to the document.
> +1 for keeping such documents regularly updated. I believe that’s also a
> motivation behind the existing "Self-Review Questionnaire: Security and
> Privacy” doc (also published by the TAG) including a final question to
> users about what updates would be helpful.

Thanks for flagging it. Indeed that was among the goals of this question.
At the same time I wonder if on some occasions it would not be useful to
understand it as "we feel that our particular API is a special case and
gives rise to these additional issues that we would like to flag...". So
for example years ago that would be the case of sensors.


Received on Wednesday, 25 September 2019 07:24:39 UTC