- From: Christine Runnegar <runnegar@isoc.org>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 18:40:59 +0000
- To: "public-privacy (W3C mailing list)" <public-privacy@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <885679EC-1EDE-4F12-9860-348A4F5C556F@isoc.org>
Hi all. As a follow-up to the call on Thursday. Please see the email from the WoT team. They are keen to have more formal feedback as early as possible. Would someone be willing to take point in preparing draft comments? Christine Begin forwarded message: From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org<mailto:ashimura@w3.org>> Subject: Next steps for WoT and Privacy? (was Re: WoT and provicy) Date: 21 June2019 at 9:40:21 AM PDT To: Christine Runnegar <runnegar@isoc.org<mailto:runnegar@isoc.org>>, tjwhalen@gmail.com<mailto:tjwhalen@gmail.com>, weiler@w3.org<mailto:weiler@w3.org> Cc: Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org<mailto:wseltzer@w3.org>>, team-wot@w3.org<mailto:team-wot@w3.org>, "Kaebisch, Sebastian" <sebastian.kaebisch@siemens.com<mailto:sebastian.kaebisch@siemens.com>>, Takuki Kamiya <tkamiya@us.fujitsu.com<mailto:tkamiya@us.fujitsu.com>>, contact@charpi.fr<mailto:contact@charpi.fr>, Michael.Lagally@oracle.com<mailto:Michael.Lagally@oracle.com>, elena.reshetova@intel.com<mailto:elena.reshetova@intel.com> Hi Tara, Christine, Sam and all, adding the WoT Chairs (team-wot) and Editors (Sebastian, Taki, Victor, Lagally and Elena) to CC Thanks a lot for inviting us to the PING call yesterday! We really appreciate your kind help to improve the WoT Thing Description [1] and the WoT Architecture [2] from the privacy management viewpoint. Our impression from the call was that you were interested in providing concrete comments on our GitHub issues to propose improvements. If so, please raise your issue(s) on the following GitHub repos with the yellow "Privacy" label. * WoT Thing Description issues: https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/issues * WoT Architecture issues: https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/issues Please note that as we mentioned during the call, the WoT Architecture is abstract architecture design and the WoT Thing Description is the concrete data model definition for IoT purposes. So we'd expect your comments mainly for the WoT Thing Description. Also please note that as I mentioned during the call, we might be going to make some of your issues "v.next" if those issues are difficult for the current version. Regarding the timing of your comments, by when do you think you could give your comments on the above GitHub repositories? As we mentioned during the call, we're planning to transition to Proposed Recommendation shortly. So the earlier, the better. For example, do you think you by chance could provide your comments on Monday, June 24? Or do you need some more time, e.g., June 27? BTW, I personally think it would have been better for us to start with some more abstract/general summary about the WoT mechanism, e.g.: * McCool's presentation during the AC meeting: https://www.w3.org/2019/Talks/ac-slides/lt-michael-mccool/wot.pdf * WoT Thing Description explainer document for TAG review: https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/blob/TD-TAG-review/explainer/Explainer.md * WoT Architecture explainer document for TAG review: https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/blob/TAG-review/proposals/WoT%20Architecture%20Explainer.md Also we should have mentioned the WoT Security and Privacy Guidelines document much earlier: https://w3c.github.io/wot-security/ Sorry the way we presented our specifications during the call yesterday was not necessary the best one. [1] https://w3c.github.io/wot-thing-description/ [2] https://w3c.github.io/wot-architecture/ Thanks again, Kazuyuki
Received on Tuesday, 25 June 2019 18:41:27 UTC