- From: Nataliia Bielova <nataliia.bielova@inria.fr>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 22:25:52 +0200
- To: Pete Snyder <psnyder@brave.com>, "public-privacy (W3C mailing list)" <public-privacy@w3.org>
- Cc: Samuel Weiler <weiler@w3.org>, Shivan Kaul Sahib <shivankaulsahib@gmail.com>, Nick Doty <npdoty@ischool.berkeley.edu>
Dear all, in the past we’ve done some research on browser fingerprinting by browser extensions [1], and in particular we have looked into fingerprinting by tracking protection extensions: AdBlock, Disconnect, Ghostery and Privacy Badger. We analyzed the tradeoff between the privacy loss (how fingerprintable users with such extensions are) and the level of protection provided by these extensions — see Section 7 for more details. [1] http://www-sop.inria.fr/members/Nataliia.Bielova/papers/Guly-etal-18-WPES.pdf Best, Nataliia --- Nataliia Bielova Researcher at Inria http://www-sop.inria.fr/members/Nataliia.Bielova/ https://twitter.com/nataliabielova > On 18 Jun 2019, at 18:35, Pete Snyder <psnyder@brave.com> wrote: > > I’m currently not planning on being in Montreal, so sadly I won’t be able to join you. But there is a sig amount of research work in this area (identifying / fingerprinting users based on their use of privacy tools, and the privacy properties of private browsing modes). > > I know some of those papers have been shared on this mailing list already, but I’d be happy to gather and (re)share some if it’d be helpful. > > Pete Snyder > {pes,psnyder}@brave.com > Brave Software > Privacy Researcher > >> On Jun 18, 2019, at 5:14 AM, Samuel Weiler <weiler@w3.org> wrote: >> >> On 6/16/19 4:29 PM, Shivan Kaul Sahib wrote: >>> Thanks Nick. >>> A couple of IETFs ago at the f2f PING meeting, folks discussed building a "Panopticlick <https://panopticlick.eff.org/> for Private Browsing Mode" i.e. a web page that a user can navigate to while in private-browsing mode and check if 1) they are detectable, 2) what guarantees their browser provides them while in private-browsing (doesn't retain cookies, etc). It would also be somewhat similar to the WebRTC Local IP Address leak page we worked on last year (though I hope with prettier UI/marketing): https://ntblk.github.io/webrtc-privacy/ >>> If there's interest and people are showing up for IETF next month in Montreal, we could get a table at the hackathon, else async. >> >> That would amuse me, and I plan to be around. Anyone else? >> > >
Received on Tuesday, 18 June 2019 20:26:18 UTC