- From: Bennett Cyphers <bennett@eff.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 13:56:29 -0700
- To: public-privacy@w3.org
In case anyone missed it, the full text is out: https://www.hawley.senate.gov/sites/default/files/2019-05/Do-Not-Track-Act_Bill-Text.pdf On 5/21/19 1:53 PM, Rigo Wenning wrote: > On Montag, 20. Mai 2019 18:17:41 CEST Craig Spiezle wrote: >> Thanks for forwarding. I am hopeful one of these efforts gains traction >> and bi-partisan support. On a related note I find it somewhat ironic >> that IAB now states it is in support of providing users more control >> over tracking. >> https://www.smartbrief.com/s/2019/05/iab-supports-regulation-ad-trackin >> g-technology >> >> I guess the devil is in the details > If I could bet, I would bet that they do what they have done in the DNT > game. Namely saying that "not tracking" means not showing targeted ads to > the user while still collecting all the data. As Mike pointed out, the IAB > tools have some consent functionality already, so some legal confirmation > just furthers their business with their tool. > But I don't think it will go as far as DNT that can be used with GDPR. One > of the reasons why IAB moved out was that the Tracking protection Group > wasn't really keen to allow those nice semantic re-definitions (if you > permit the sarcasm). > > If one calls that "detail", you may be right. > > --Rigo > > > > -- Bennett Cyphers (he/him) General Staff Technologist, EFF (415) 436-9333 x191
Received on Tuesday, 21 May 2019 20:57:51 UTC