- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 09:36:12 -0700
- To: Tom Ritter <tom@ritter.vg>
- Cc: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, public-privacy@w3.org
> On Mar 27, 2018, at 7:50 , Tom Ritter <tom@ritter.vg> wrote: > >> The Security & Privacy appending of High Resolution Time should be consulted for further information on clock resolution and drift. > > I think that's a typo: 'Appendix'? > > The added text, and in particular 'Does this specification expose any > other data to an origin that it doesn’t currently have access to?' > section is pretty good. > > I am curious though - Is the Security and Privacy Implications section > complete? Normally this section is written out in more of a prose > style than in the Q/A style to the questionnaire, isn't it? Yes, the questionnaires are, I think, designed to help you think (and they are, I think, still missing the important “and what else about your spec. raises privacy concerns that these questions have not exposed?”). > > -tom > > > > On 27 March 2018 at 08:55, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> wrote: >> Tom, >> >> The issue you raised has been discussed by the Audio WG and the spec >> updated. Please see >> >> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/1457 >> >> and let us know whether the language added to the spec addresses your >> concern? >> >> >> -- >> Chris Lilley >> @svgeesus >> Technical Director @ W3C >> W3C Strategy Team, Core Web Design >> W3C Architecture & Technology Team, Core Web & Media >> > David Singer Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Tuesday, 27 March 2018 16:36:39 UTC