>> So I would like to work through an example spec. and how the privacy considerations ended up being written, as a way to show/teach people how to fish for themselves. The model where a small interest group does the privacy review post-facto is unsustainable, IMHO, for two reasons (a) the group is too small and (b) ‘wide review’ stage is waaay too late to be thinking about privacy implications. >> >> Makes sense? Yes :) Here is an example presentation from 2013 by Hannes Tschofenig that may be helpful in this context: https://github.com/hannestschofenig/tschofenig-ids/raw/master/PrivacyTutorial/iab-privacy-considerations.pptx Suggestion for a walkthrough: 1. Description of what was done. 2. What privacy concerns were raised / discussed? 3. What changes have been made in response to those discussions? 4. Lessons learned Rob — Sent from browser, all error self inflicted. PGP id: CC4F3863 PGP fingerprint: 1D00 A9FD 7CCB A5A5 850E 2149 BEA0 20B7 CC4F 3863 [public key] Social media: @rvaneijk, github, linkedin, ssrn, stackoverflow <http://stackoverflow.com/users/4725192/rvaneijk?tab=profile> .
Received on Monday, 8 May 2017 19:40:34 UTC