- From: Mike West <mkwst@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 21:20:48 +0200
- To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Cc: "www-tag@w3.org List" <www-tag@w3.org>, "public-privacy@w3.org" <public-privacy@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 28 September 2016 19:21:51 UTC
+public-privacy@, who have been thinking along similar lines. -mike On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 8:23 PM, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote: > Dear TAG, > > In the Web Payments Working Group, a task force reviewed some of our > specifications using > the checklist "Self-Review Questionnaire: Security and Privacy." Section > 3.14 [1] refers to > considerations when in “incognito mode.” We have two comments based on our > experience. > > 1) The first is editorial: “Incognito Mode” is specific to Google. > Although the term appears in quotes, > our feedback is that the checklist should probably use a generic term > such as “private browsing > mode.” > > 2) The second is more substantive: because there is no standard behavior > among browsers for > a private browsing mode, we did not feel we could offer standard > guidance to developers > on how to manage payment app behavior in such a mode. > > Further clarity in the questionnaire would help us determine what, if > anything, to add > to our specification. > > Thank you, > > Adam Roach (Mozilla) and Ian Jacobs (W3C) > > [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/security-privacy-questionnaire/#incognito > > -- > Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs > Tel: +1 718 260 9447 > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 28 September 2016 19:21:51 UTC