Re: Vibration API privacy considerations

Hi Chaals,

I can definitely take a look at this, but things are a little hectic at
work. Do you have a timeline for how soon you need feedback?

Thanks!


/********************************************/
Greg Norcie (norcie@cdt.org)
Staff Technologist
Center for Democracy & Technology
District of Columbia office
(p) 202-637-9800
PGP: http://norcie.com/pgp.txt



*CDT's Annual Dinner (Tech Prom) is April 6, 2016.  Don't miss out!learn
more at https://cdt.org/annual-dinner <https://cdt.org/annual-dinner>*
/*******************************************/

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Chaals McCathie Nevile <
chaals@yandex-team.ru> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> the Device API group are considering proposing a revision of the Vibration
> API, and one of the things they propose adding is a section on Security and
> Privacy.
>
> The current proposal is <
> https://github.com/anssiko/vibration/commit/48489c54e0b7ed80900e0906fa79803c8fa77069
> >
>
> The two things identified are that vibration can be picked up with e.g.
> motion sensors in the same device for fingerprinting, and that a vibrating
> device can be physicall observed externally.
>
> Wondering if anyone has further input.
>
> Cheers
>
> --
> Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex
>  chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 16 February 2016 18:00:22 UTC