- From: Eduardo Robles Elvira <edulix@agoravoting.com>
- Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:55:50 +0100
- To: Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
- Cc: "Mike O'Neill" <michael.oneill@baycloud.com>, public-web-security@w3.org, public-privacy@w3.org
Hello Dave: This sounds interesting to me. I work on an electronic voting system and identity verification is, as you can imagine, a very important issue. Some thoughts: - This kind of thing might be useful for payments, but of course can be very handy in many other use cases. - how does this relate to HOBA? [2] (HOBA provides auth credentials and implements a verification procedure) - In e-voting, having a somehow standardized yet powerful/flexible procedure would be useful. Sometimes we need to verify age, others we have verify postal codes, and I can only wonder what would be the next thing they might need to verify. - Mention of the idea of using coordinate cards (as some banks use) as a challenge/verification procedure. Regards, -- [2] https://github.com/razevedo/hoba-authentication -- Eduardo Robles Elvira @edulix skype: edulix2 http://agoravoting.org @agoravoting +34 634 571 634 On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> wrote: > > On 13 Feb 2015, at 21:22, Mike O'Neill <michael.oneill@baycloud.com> wrote: > > I agree that an identity verification protocol based on explicit consent > should be a standard component of the web platform, but I think it should be > designed so there would no need for a fixed “real-world” identity. > > The third-party entities could validate an arbitrary set of attributes, some > of which may identify a legal person i.e. passport or birth certificate, but > others could be anonymous attributes such as membership of a club, a child’s > age, an anonymous audience category, or any attribute that the parties need > and agree to without the necessity to inform any of the parties, including > the validating parties, of other identifying attributes. > > > These refer to additional use cases, e.g. to prove that I am a child for > access to a safe site for children. I would encourage you to describe the > use cases, since this is important for justifying work on a standard. There > are no major technical barriers to pseudo-anonymous identity verification, > so this is mostly about consensus building. > > I built a demo for this kind of approach some years back around a use case > where you need to prove you are a current student at a given university to > gain access to a site run by students for students. The demo uses a Firefox > extension for idemix. More details are given at: > > http://people.w3.org/~dsr/blog/?p=95 > > It might be easier, however, to start with work on a standard for simple > comparisons against attributes, where the website/app already knows your > name and address etc., and wants to verify that the web identity you are > logged in with corresponds to that real-world identity. This doesn’t involve > a loss of privacy since the website and the identity agent being asked to > perform the verification already know your real-world identity. > > — > Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> > > >
Received on Saturday, 14 February 2015 10:56:50 UTC