- From: Rob van Eijk <rob@blaeu.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:24:55 +0100
- To: Joe Hall <joe@cdt.org>
- Cc: David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>, public-privacy@w3.org
Joe Hall schreef op 2015-01-26 19:38: (...)> >> c) it recognizes that privacy is not a binary state — it’s not an >> either-or (you have it or you don’t); it’s a spectrum, and it’s about >> perception and control and exposure as much as it is about recording >> and so on. > > Forgive me again... are you saying that by being able to have as many > persona as I can keep track of that I'm "articulating" (a social > science term of art, sorry) different aspects of my being that I'd > rather servers not link together? That is rather interesting. For > example, you could have a persona for activities that you want privacy > of a certain level (say me looking at job candidate websites online) > and another persona for activities of a higher level (say, if I'm > looking at content online that I'd rather not have linked to my > not-so-private self)? > > thanks again, Joe Joe, David, If I am not mistaken, Joe's description opens up a possible implementation of contextual integrity [Nissenbaum]. Best, Rob
Received on Monday, 26 January 2015 20:25:25 UTC