- From: Eric J. Bowman <eric@bisonsystems.net>
- Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 18:13:07 -0700
- To: "henry.story@bblfish.net" <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Cc: Marc Fawzi <marc.fawzi@gmail.com>, Chris Palmer <palmer@google.com>, Nick Doty <npdoty@w3.org>, David Singer <singer@apple.com>, TAG List <www-tag@w3.org>, "public-privacy (W3C mailing list)" <public-privacy@w3.org>
"henry.story@bblfish.net" wrote: > > without TLS you may be in a tent but you have no idea if the people > you are talking to are the ones you think they are, or if the > communication has been altered along the way. > Still a problem with TLS. Some mechanism for detecting altered content would benefit both use cases. Yeah, no security is perfect, but I don't see how any solution actually solves the problem without some sort of integrity check, which would change the entire framing of this debate, for the better, if it existed. -Eric
Received on Wednesday, 31 December 2014 01:13:23 UTC