- From: Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joe@cdt.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 14:24:37 -0400
- To: public-privacy@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 3/11/14, 3:05 PM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: > > I am always uncertain whether you guys talk about #1 or #2 when > you refer to RFC 6973. You seem to conflate the two aspects. This is a good point. I'll need to review the w3c document you've been working on, but I'd hope PING can think about both document-centric guidelines as well as how privacy considerations fit in the larger w3c standardization process. best, Joe - -- Joseph Lorenzo Hall Chief Technologist Center for Democracy & Technology 1634 I ST NW STE 1100 Washington DC 20006-4011 (p) 202-407-8825 (f) 202-637-0968 joe@cdt.org PGP: https://josephhall.org/gpg-key fingerprint: 3CA2 8D7B 9F6D DBD3 4B10 1607 5F86 6987 40A9 A871 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJTIfflAAoJEF+GaYdAqahxsjIP/1hkvDlmI8cfQoz/kkBLAh6T veCmtSHayKiLomDUWhJJKCvCfWnkZkjNfK1IBwC6Bj34dzU1xm4lRaGemhSnSS/x ACd+Y7YYabJbai4LgaTyiBY87lex5M2KrvWfSIqCQTqUDWnDwIaPfWjH2tVW48+P uSUGurPN1EHMKpsY75PPgVMcE3SfEhWfHNTE6AAvtLNWHmvoeyVZQilhEcZJIcYy QF04CNiaFriUl+IIXzDRFJOl8Tjd1qPe39Qo6nd7E0niGD5Ntb9td4dYoD9yn812 joole+nedpkr+qY06uazltn/FxiZIVUXrRwS9Yrl40+nTXHfb5tXpNDDbz1tjD4I KO4MmSJmez/AqaMrKMvzktRNHh5m1C5V6Q5I3Sgacjov4bcfiQxA7pLQDNgqc2zR v+EUEh5mUZEeGsore31u43bbSwa+f1lHH4DzeSh99lSj0xPzMgWYvRsOg6/m5qjn IeUW94Lowic5amynIV1o8mml4bp4cv70ntgBAu/F28/4vQfphDQmPNlwnMNQCJA1 Fgn/roC2T2MFjporI8kWvn6MxszOJVlfuBlwrCpcy4jYxazAIxnZsIbydlJ8Fd9K qVyabB9L51ug3njA4octx69JwCgpuKoRFmL+jM785+x+zRioeu5Rt3NSzFwSAsE+ iCRetxdxysvKj4WB/GmX =95lC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 13 March 2014 18:25:05 UTC