- From: Ben Laurie <benl@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 11:50:14 +0100
- To: nathan@webr3.org
- Cc: Ben Laurie <ben@links.org>, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>, Halpin Harry <H.halplin@ed.ac.uk>, public-identity@w3.org, saag@ietf.org, public-webid@w3.org, "public-privacy@w3.org list" <public-privacy@w3.org>
On 23 October 2012 10:56, Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote: > Ben Laurie wrote: >> >> b) Linkability it not, as you say, inherently bad. The problem occurs >> when you have (effectively) no choice about linkability. > > > .. and when people convey or infer that there is no choice about > linkability, when there really is scope to be as unlinkable as one likes > within WebID. I have never disputed that - my point is that if I am as unlinkable as I like I then have a fairly horrific problem managing a large number of certificates and remembering which one I used where.
Received on Tuesday, 23 October 2012 10:50:43 UTC