Re: When should PING start reviewing specs? [Was: Re: Privacy and fingerprintability]

Thanks for the suggestion Arthur. 

Would someone involved in developing the specification be willing to join the call next Thursday and walk us through it as a lead into the privacy discussion?

Christine

On Sep 13, 2012, at 6:12 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:

> On 9/13/12 12:08 PM, ext David Singer wrote:
>> Maybe we should pick a spec that is not too large, might have interesting un-exposed privacy concerns, and use it as a learning vehicle?
> 
> Good idea. How about Web Intents, latest ED is <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/web-intents/raw-file/tip/spec/Overview-respec.html> and most recent "stable" version is <http://www.w3.org/TR/web-intents/>?
> 
> -AB
> 
> 

Received on Friday, 14 September 2012 08:44:53 UTC