- From: Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo) <hannes.tschofenig@nsn.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 13:43:31 +0300
- To: "ext Chappelle, Kasey, Vodafone Group" <Kasey.Chappelle@vodafone.com>, "Hannes Tschofenig" <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
- Cc: "public-privacy (W3C mailing list)" <public-privacy@w3.org>
I wasn't thinking about a solution. I wasn't quite sure what type of investigations I would have to do so that they meet your expectations. > -----Original Message----- > From: ext Chappelle, Kasey, Vodafone Group > [mailto:Kasey.Chappelle@vodafone.com] > Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 1:38 PM > To: Hannes Tschofenig > Cc: public-privacy (W3C mailing list) > Subject: Re: Follow-up re regulations and standards > > Let's not get bogged down with solutions at this stage - all I wanted > was to get us started brainstorming pain points between privacy > needs/regulation and standards work. MacTed said they exist and I think > many of us have run up against them at one time or another. So what are > they? > > On 24 Aug 2012, at 11:20, "Hannes Tschofenig" > <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> wrote: > > > > > On Aug 24, 2012, at 12:40 PM, Chappelle, Kasey, Vodafone Group wrote: > > > >> prompting regimes are both overinclusive (they appear when not > necessary) and under-explanatory (they do not allow users to understand > why data is collected or what happens next before they give consent). > > > > Assume the group would be working on such a topic what would be an > ideal output? > > > >
Received on Friday, 24 August 2012 10:44:04 UTC