- From: Mark Lizar <info@smartspecies.com>
- Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 13:07:21 +0100
- To: Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com>
- Cc: "public-privacy@w3.org mailing list) <public-privacy@w3.org>" <public-privacy@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <57111659-3F12-43D1-8566-2B44B3738C94@smartspecies.com>
Karl, I think is very interesting and presents an important point of discussion for public privacy. Tracking wi-fi, is very similar in some ways to video surveillance, which still represents public -privacy issues that need better resolutions. There was an article in the UK about the need for notice in tracking back in January. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/01/11/phone_tracking_expert/ I have been discussing this case with the lawyer who was quoted in this article. To make a long story short I am currently testing a hypothesis, which has now involved sending in 4 complaints about corporate notice (CCTV) practices to the UK ICO's office. The compliant is asking the ICO to enforce the requirement for CCTV signs to be displayed appropriately according to the 1998 Data Protection, in part for the precedent in dealing with the emerging wi-fi tracking and legal requirements for notice. The idea being to develop a common set of processes for administering consent and control of tracking using data protection within the context of tracking. I am hoping for a response next week and am looking to work towards a general framework for privacy in surveillance and best practices for notice. One question that has come up is weather or not this information collected is personal, in what ways does your wi-fi beceome PII and require data protection? My contention here is that this tracking data is retro-active, in that, in the future historical tracking data can be made personal. Therefore, I am wondering if this type of tracking should be classified as personal data when it is collected. The companies performing these services argue that the data tracked is not personal. Thanks for this link, Mark On 21 Apr 2012, at 13:06, Karl Dubost wrote: > As soon we wave a flag, we are identifiable. This time a company > (Navizon) which is using WIFI device signature to geolocate people > "anonymously" until the device signature is a known identifier for > their identity. > > http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/mimssbits/27784/?p1=blogs > > -- > Karl Dubost - http://dev.opera.com/ > Developer Relations, Opera Software > >
Received on Sunday, 22 April 2012 12:13:05 UTC