- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:11:19 +0200
- To: Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com>
- Cc: Peter Kraker <peter.kraker@tugraz.at>, public-privacy@w3.org
On 18 April 2012 15:00, Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com> wrote: > Le 16 avr. 2012 à 18:42, Peter Kraker a écrit : >> the notion that the (almost) total loss of privacy is inevitable. > > Then I'm curious about how you define privacy. It would be helpful to distinguish offline and online aspects, at least. I'm prepared to buy the scifi vision of little flying robotic bugs with cameras streaming, recording, monitoring almost everything we do in daily life. But I still expect it to be feasible to have a bug free space somewhere where I can have unmonitored conversations with others via the 'net. The 'privacy is dead, get over it' line risks having us give up on the possibility for private online communication rather prematurely. Dan
Received on Wednesday, 18 April 2012 13:11:57 UTC