- From: Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 08:44:20 -0500
- To: "public-privacy (W3C mailing list)" <public-privacy@w3.org>
Very good reading about the crap around the social graph. The "Social networks exist to sell you crap." is a well focused sentence articulating the two ways you can handle the issue: 1. We use ads to provide free services. 2. We use free services to sell ads. Often businesses start with 1. but quickly turn into 2. once the business starts to be profitable and it's why the "If you do not pay, you are the product." sentence is being more and more popular. http://blog.pinboard.in/2011/11/the_social_graph_is_neither/ Social networks exist to sell you crap. The icky feeling you get when your friend starts to talk to you about Amway, or when you spot someone passing out business cards at a birthday party, is the entire driving force behind a site like Facebook. Because their collection methods are kind of primitive, these sites have to coax you into doing as much of your social interaction as possible while logged in, so they can see it. It's as if an ad agency built a nationwide chain of pubs and night clubs in the hopes that people would spend all their time there, rigging the place with microphones and cameras to keep abreast of the latest trends (and staffing it, of course, with that Mormon bartender). We're used to talking about how disturbing this in the context of privacy, but it's worth pointing out how weirdly unsocial it is, too. How are you supposed to feel at home when you know a place is full of one-way mirrors? We have a name for the kind of person who collects a detailed, permanent dossier on everyone they interact with, with the intent of using it to manipulate others for personal advantage - we call that person a sociopath. And both Google and Facebook have gone deep into stalker territory with their attempts to track our every action. Even if you have faith in their good intentions, you feel misgivings about stepping into the elaborate shrine they've built to document your entire online life. Open data advocates tell us the answer is to reclaim this obsessive dossier for ourselves, so we can decide where to store it. But this misses the point of how stifling it is to have such a permanent record in the first place. Who does that kind of thing and calls it social? -- Karl Dubost - http://dev.opera.com/ Developer Relations & Tools, Opera Software
Received on Wednesday, 9 November 2011 13:44:59 UTC