- From: Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 08:44:20 -0500
- To: "public-privacy (W3C mailing list)" <public-privacy@w3.org>
Very good reading about the crap around the social graph.
The "Social networks exist to sell you crap." is a well
focused sentence articulating the two ways you can handle
the issue:
1. We use ads to provide free services.
2. We use free services to sell ads.
Often businesses start with 1. but quickly turn into 2.
once the business starts to be profitable and it's why
the "If you do not pay, you are the product." sentence
is being more and more popular.
http://blog.pinboard.in/2011/11/the_social_graph_is_neither/
Social networks exist to sell you crap. The icky feeling
you get when your friend starts to talk to you about
Amway, or when you spot someone passing out business
cards at a birthday party, is the entire driving force
behind a site like Facebook.
Because their collection methods are kind of primitive,
these sites have to coax you into doing as much of your
social interaction as possible while logged in, so they
can see it. It's as if an ad agency built a nationwide
chain of pubs and night clubs in the hopes that people
would spend all their time there, rigging the place with
microphones and cameras to keep abreast of the latest
trends (and staffing it, of course, with that Mormon
bartender).
We're used to talking about how disturbing this in the
context of privacy, but it's worth pointing out how
weirdly unsocial it is, too. How are you supposed to
feel at home when you know a place is full of one-way
mirrors?
We have a name for the kind of person who collects a
detailed, permanent dossier on everyone they interact
with, with the intent of using it to manipulate others
for personal advantage - we call that person a
sociopath. And both Google and Facebook have gone deep
into stalker territory with their attempts to track our
every action. Even if you have faith in their good
intentions, you feel misgivings about stepping into the
elaborate shrine they've built to document your entire
online life.
Open data advocates tell us the answer is to reclaim
this obsessive dossier for ourselves, so we can decide
where to store it. But this misses the point of how
stifling it is to have such a permanent record in the
first place. Who does that kind of thing and calls it
social?
--
Karl Dubost - http://dev.opera.com/
Developer Relations & Tools, Opera Software
Received on Wednesday, 9 November 2011 13:44:59 UTC