- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 18:34:13 +0200
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: public-privacy@w3.org
Bjoern, you need a legal reason to tell the government that they are not allowed to do something. So saying "is wrong regardless of privacy" does not fit the current system of checks/balances. Only if Privacy or another limitation is affected, we have a valid reason not to allow warrantless GPS tracking. The legal challenge is to classify the GPS tracking into one of the buckets. Best, Rigo On Sat, 2011-09-10 at 05:55 +0200, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > warrantless GPS > tracking is okay because it does not affect privacy, is wrong, regard- > less of whether, or by how much, "privacy" is affected by doing it, or > by disclosing it publically in some personally identifiable manner.
Received on Sunday, 11 September 2011 16:34:36 UTC