- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 17:25:08 +0100
- To: Caspar Bowden <casparb@microsoft.com>
- Cc: David Singer <singer@apple.com>, "public-privacy@w3.org" <public-privacy@w3.org>
Caspar, to delete _on-the-Web_ you have to know all resources in order to know what to delete. Knowing all the resources about me is the first privacy thing. But nobody knows all the resources on the web, so how could you assert that this is just nothing new? When building the web architecture, they forgot the delete button. Deletion is simply not in the architecture as we have no bi- directional links. Having a 404 doesn't mean that it doesn't exist anymore. The legal deletion pretension for deletion already exist in most jurisdictions. Those are rather complex legal constructs needing a valid reason to ask for deletion in most cases. Consequently is a technical challenge and a privacy challenge at the same time. The privacy challenge is that in order to delete everything about you on the web, I have to know everything about you. The technical challenge is that the architecture of the web makes an "open world assumption" that nobody can possibly know "everything about you". All search engines united get to somewhat over 40% of the available information on the Web. There may be more information about you remaining in the 60% that is not indexed. And it can become indexed at any moment in time. So if you can point me to a comp.sci article that has a solution, that would be great! If this sounds provocative, you've read it the right way. :) I really want to challenge your mind here! Best, Rigo On Monday 08 November 2010 16:44:14 Caspar Bowden wrote: > > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Rigo Wenning > > ... > > > The delete button is one of the ideas floating around in Brussels at the > > moment. The technical savvy people know that this is a research topic. > > Why? What is the engineering or comp.sci novelty? > > Caspar >
Received on Monday, 8 November 2010 16:25:41 UTC