- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:36:11 +0800
- To: public-privacy@w3.org
Overall, I think this emphasizes what we said at the workshop about privacy and specifications. We need to understand what the privacy implications are of doing a 'vanilla' implementation of e.g. a browser to our specifications. What privacy consequences 'easily' or 'naturally' ensue for the user of that vanilla implementation? Here, a more-than-vanilla browser with a 'private browsing' mode may find its private browsing mode compromised by supercookies or similar HTML-level behavior. On Oct 12, 2010, at 14:31 , David Singer wrote: > Looks like it's online here (and I am not a subscriber): http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/11/business/media/11privacy.html?_r=1&ref=technology > > On Oct 12, 2010, at 14:24 , Appelquist, Daniel, VF-Group wrote: > >> Front page (at least front page of Herald Trib) this morning is an article on the privacy perils of "html5." Quoth Ian Jacobs: "there is no conspiracy." (Paraphrased.) >> >> Dan >> -- >> Daniel Appelquist >> Vodafone Group Research & Development >> Mobile: +44 7748 111635 >> daniel.appelquist@vodafone.com > > David Singer > Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc. > > David Singer Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Tuesday, 12 October 2010 06:36:47 UTC