- From: Tony Graham <tgraham@mentea.net>
- Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 14:34:51 -0000 (GMT)
- To: public-ppl@w3.org
Assuming the questions and the wording pass muster, I'll put this on a poll/survey service site: ---- The Print and Page Layout Community Group (PPL CG) @ W3C solicits your input on its focus and what it should do next. First, tell us about your involvement with markup and with page layout: My involvement is with: (pick one) - Professional publisher - Publishing consultant/service provider - In-house technical communications/publications - XML consultant/service provider - Standards body - Authoring/education - Other Markup standards I use include: (pick one or more) - HTML 5 - HTML - XHTML - EPUB 2/3 - DocBook - DITA - S1000D - UBL - Other industry-specific - Other - None of the above I 'print' using: (pick one or more) - CSS - XSL-FO - TeX - Speedata - EPUB - Kindle - Other My interest in XML is as: (pick one) - Specialist - Generalist - Novice - Interested bystander - Uninterested My interest in HTML/XHTML/HTML 5 is as: (pick one) - Specialist - Generalist - Novice - Interested bystander - Uninterested My interest in CSS is as: (pick one) - Specialist - Generalist - Novice - Interested bystander - Uninterested My interest in XSL-FO is as: (pick one) - Specialist - Generalist - Novice - Interested bystander - Uninterested My interest in Digital Publishing is as: (pick one) - Specialist - Generalist - Novice - Interested bystander - Uninterested My interest in Page Layout is as: (pick one) - Specialist - Generalist - Novice - Interested bystander - Uninterested My interest in writing software is as: (pick one) - Specialist - Generalist - Novice - Interested bystander - Uninterested My interest in standards development is as: (pick one) - Specialist - Generalist - Novice - Interested bystander - Uninterested Secondly, what should the PPL CG do next? XSL-FO discussion at the PPL CG should be: (pick one) - Primary focus - Secondary objective - Something that just happens as necessary - Off-topic If the PPL CG works on a styling specification, it should be: (pick one) - Modules layered on XSL 1.1 - XSL-FO 1.2 - XSL-FO 2.0 - Syntactic sugar for XSL 1.1 - A new, simpler page layout stylesheet language The PPL CG should develop: (pick one or more) - Software - XSL-FO specifications - Other specifications - XSL-FO tutorials - Tutorials for multiple stylesheet languages - Non language-specific tutorials on page layout principles - Function libraries for XSL-FO I am a member of the Print and Page Layout CG: (pick one) - Yes - No Any other comments: (Text box) ---- Regards, Tony.
Received on Sunday, 12 January 2014 14:35:13 UTC