- From: Tony Graham <tgraham@mentea.net>
- Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 20:58:48 -0000 (GMT)
- To: public-ppl@w3.org
On Mon, January 6, 2014 8:28 pm, Liam R E Quin wrote: > On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 20:23 +0000, Tony Graham wrote: > [...] >> It's difficult to find the calls for participation for past conferences, >> but IME it's been rare to have publishing as an explicit topic/theme for >> an XML conference in recent years, and possibly unprecedented for it to >> be >> a topic/theme for two in the same year. > I'd say that MarkupForum has had that theme for a while; I don't know > about XML London or XML Amsterdam, they aren't really on my radar > (should they be, I wonder?) Seems it's not just politics that's local, it's also XML conferences. I haven't paid much attention to MarkupForum [1], mostly because I don't speak German, so I wasn't considering it. XML London only started last year, so it's hard to say how much attention you should pay it. I was local to it last year since I was working near London at the time, so I went, and this year it's a short plane ride away, much like the rest of Europe is. I've never been able to go to XML Amsterdam. >> I also can't find the XML Prague 2014 call for participation anymore, >> but >> note that the XML London 2014 call manages to not explicitly mention >> XSL-FO. > > I think people are more interested in CSS + (X)HTML right now. That More people, certainly. > doesn't (to me) say anything bad about XSL-FO, just that CSS + (X)HTML > is more fashionable and is clearly where the most energy is being spent. Agreed. Regards, Tony. [1] http://www.markupforum.de/
Received on Monday, 6 January 2014 20:59:11 UTC