- From: Tony Graham <tgraham@mentea.net>
- Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 13:21:06 -0000 (GMT)
- To: "Print and Page Layout Community Group" <public-ppl@w3.org>
On Wed, March 6, 2013 1:55 pm, Tony Graham wrote: > This is an idea that Liam has talked about at various times, but would it > be useful *not* put things like copy-fitting into the ppl's version of the > XSL-FO 2.0 WD and to instead make (as much as possible) standalone modules > for new additions such as copy-fitting? The ppl's XSL-FO spec would then > be largely XSL 1.1 (+ errata) and the changes necessary to describe how > other modules would slot into the larger whole. Even if it is 'largely XSL 1.1', starting from the last XSL-FO 2.0 editor's draft would be better than starting from the XSL 1.1 spec XML because the editor's draft has a lot more links where FO and property names occur in the text. Regards, Tony.
Received on Monday, 11 March 2013 13:21:36 UTC