- From: Tony Graham <tgraham@mentea.net>
- Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 22:30:17 +0100 (IST)
- To: public-ppl@w3.org
On Fri, April 26, 2013 9:31 pm, Tony Graham wrote: ... > We don't actually know whether the W3C would want any software put in its > name, or whether there'd be additional paperwork for the legal niceties of > assigning copyright to the W3C. I'll ask the CG support people if the W3C > has a policy about this. If the W3C is happy to have random (from their > perspective) bits of code assigned to them, then I suggest we'll go for > the W3C license, otherwise I suggest we'll go for the Apache-2.0 license > and find some entity to be the copyright holder. I ended up just asking for license recommendations, and as expected the recommendation was for the W3C license: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/site-comments/2013May/0003.html Regards, Tony.
Received on Monday, 3 June 2013 21:30:44 UTC