- From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 16:00:58 +0000
- To: xsl-fo Community Group <public-ppl@w3.org>
On 24 February 2013 14:26, Patrick Gundlach <gundlach@speedata.de> wrote: >>> I am not sure why you use the term "fo:blocks". As far as I know, this is not a special FO community. The Customer requirements are independent of a special technology. >> >> I relate requirements to the xsl-fo wd. Hence requirements are for >> implementation against that document >> or a later version of it. > > I think that most of the requirements are not solvable with any current or future version of XSL-FO, unless XSL-FO changes in a dramatic way. Which is why we are here? to specify those changes? Or are we here for different reasons? regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Received on Sunday, 24 February 2013 16:01:25 UTC