Re: Customer requirement, a critque

On 24 February 2013 14:26, Patrick Gundlach <> wrote:

>>> I am not sure why you use the term "fo:blocks". As far as I know, this is not a special FO community. The Customer requirements are independent of a special technology.
>> I relate requirements to the xsl-fo wd. Hence requirements are for
>> implementation against that document
>> or a later version of it.
> I think that most of the requirements are not solvable with any current or future version of XSL-FO, unless XSL-FO changes in a dramatic way.

Which is why we are here? to specify those changes?

Or are we here for different reasons?


Dave Pawson
Docbook FAQ.

Received on Sunday, 24 February 2013 16:01:25 UTC