- From: Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca>
- Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 13:07:21 -0400
- To: public-ppl@w3.org
On 12/19/2013 02:25 AM, Dave Pawson wrote: > On 18 December 2013 22:44, Michael Hahn <xmlronin@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I'd like to add a couple of niche products from the 90s - >> >> Omnimark: SGML/XML to HTML or RTF >> >> WordPerfect SGML/XML tools: DSSSL-like stylesheet language for the built-in >> print engine. > Which introduces a scope issue? > Should this group scope its work to include / exclude transformations? > DSSSL had transform/layout, as did XSL (initially). > My view, XSLT does a good job. Keep it out of scope. > > [ SNIP ] How do you tackle CSS? That technology combines transformation and layout. Arved
Received on Thursday, 19 December 2013 17:07:50 UTC