- From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 18:14:00 +0000
- To: Tony Graham <tgraham@mentea.net>
- Cc: xsl-fo Community Group <public-ppl@w3.org>
"For people interested in XSL-FO and related page layout technologies, the Print & Page Layout Community Group is the "virtual water cooler" where they can hang out and discuss aspects of the current draft, of test cases, of implementations, or of requirements in advance of their solution in any draft. The success of the XSL-FO meetup at XML Prague 2012 shows there's a strong undercurrent of interest in XSL-FO and its implementation, and the Print and Page Layout Community Group is intended as a place where we can start to build a larger community of XSL-FO users and help to raise the visibility of this important technology." An alternative: the Print & Page Layout Community Group is here to discuss XSL-FO, requirements or other aspects of XML in print. The success of the XSL-FO as a technology shows there's a strong interest in development and implementation. The Print and Page Layout Community Group is intended as a place to build a community of XSL-FO users and raise the visibility of this technology HTH On 17 December 2013 12:39, Tony Graham <tgraham@mentea.net> wrote: > The description at the top of http://www.w3.org/community/ppl/ is looking > a bit dated: > > ---- > For people interested in XSL-FO and related page layout technologies, the > Print & Page Layout Community Group is the "virtual water cooler" where > they can hang out and discuss aspects of the current draft, of test cases, > of implementations, or of requirements in advance of their solution in any > draft. The success of the XSL-FO meetup at XML Prague 2012 shows there's a > strong undercurrent of interest in XSL-FO and its implementation, and the > Print and Page Layout Community Group is intended as a place where we can > start to build a larger community of XSL-FO users and help to raise the > visibility of this important technology. > ---- > > Whether or not you think XSL-FO is looking a bit dated, the references to > 'current draft' and 'XML Prague 2012' definitely are. > > What should go in a revised description? > > Regards, > > > Tony. > > -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Received on Tuesday, 17 December 2013 18:14:32 UTC