- From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 17:22:12 +0000
- To: public-ppl@w3.org
On 20 March 2012 16:56, David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> wrote: > On 20/03/2012 16:37, Dave Pawson wrote: >> >> I'm speaking of authoring at the xsl-fo level David? Not at the XSLT >> with embedded xsl-fo ? Is that what you meant? > > > Yes I know, but what I mean is, the logic that attribute content should > be restricted to types easily expressed in a relaxng grammar would, if > applied to xslt, mean getting rid of xpath. Given that, I'm not sure > that that is a good logic to apply to xsl-fo. (There may be other > reasons for changing, but I can't agree that that is a good one.) In which case leave those as 'unable to be validated' using a grammar, or add them to the list for Schematron / as and when? It's not those expressions I'm aiming at currently. regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Received on Tuesday, 20 March 2012 17:22:45 UTC