- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 16:01:31 +0100
- To: public-ppl@w3.org
On 13/04/2012 22:44, Tony Graham wrote: > Personally, I don't see that the W3C is set up for CGs to write a spec in > the absence of a WG to take it over and bless it. For starters, CGs don't > come with CVS or Mercurial access on the W3C servers so it would be harder > for a CG to do things that fit into the regular spec-production processes. Is that necessarily true? xml-er is similarly a CG and it has http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xml-er/raw-file/tip/Overview.html admittedly Anne works for a member company and is a member of several WG in addition to the CG but the draft is under the control of a CG. David
Received on Saturday, 14 April 2012 15:01:54 UTC