- From: Smith, Kevin, (R&D) VF-Group <Kevin.Smith@vodafone.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 13:11:39 +0100
- To: "Public POWDER" <public-powderwg@w3.org>
Hi Robert, all, I'm not sure if this may be an omission on the ICRA site. @to the POWDER group: The original RDFS vocabulary [1] lists sz as 'No Sexual Content' - and it is mentioned in the human-readable text of the 2008 update [2]. However there is no 'sexual content' section at all (only nudity) in the RDF binding [3]. Is that deliberate? There is a footnote at [2] which may help explain: "For developers: The new vocabulary will be introduced when we begin implementing the Protocol for Web Description Resources (POWDER). The namespace will be http://www.icra.org/rdfs/vocabulary2008. The vocabulary is already available in RDF from that URI." Best, Kevin [1] http://www.icra.org/rdfs/vocabularyv03 [2] http://www.icra.org/vocabulary/2008/ [3] http://www.icra.org/rdfs/vocabulary2008.rdf Thanks for your interest in POWDER and for taking the time to post. <icra:sz> was originally used -----Original Message----- From: public-powderwg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-powderwg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Robert Chapin Sent: 01 March 2010 10:14 To: public-powderwg@w3.org Subject: Errors in POWDER Document There appears to be some kind of mistake in http://www.w3.org/TR/powder-primer/icra_example.xml The example uses an element named <icra:sz> which is not defined. I am looking in http://www.icra.org/rdfs/vocabulary2008 and that element simply doesn't exist.
Received on Monday, 1 March 2010 12:14:58 UTC