- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 16:19:54 +0200
- To: public-powderwg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <487B608A.8040707@w3.org>
Comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-powder-formal-20080709/, Formal Semantics A small remark after the second example in section 3, namely: [[[ The owl:intersectionOf of a singleton collection in both descriptor sets, although redundant, is a result of the GRDDL transformation. ]]] triggered a question: what is _exactly_ the status of the GRDDL transformation? Is the GRDDL transformation normative? Or is the definition in this document the normative one, and the Working Group provides a GRDDL transformation implementing it for the good of the community? In other words, can I implement my own (GRDDL or otherwise) transformation that provides a _semantically equivalent_ but syntactically different graph? There are obvious examples (order of constructions within the generated document) and also a bit trickier one. The note above refers to: <owl:Class rdf:ID="descriptorset_2"> <owl:intersectionOf rdf:parseType="Collection"> <owl:Restriction> <owl:onProperty rdf:resource="http://example.org/vocab#color"/> <owl:hasValue rdf:resource="http://example.org/vocab#red"/> </owl:Restriction> </owl:intersectionOf> </owl:Class> what if I generate the following OWL construction instead? <owl:Class rdf:ID="descriptorset_2_ivan"> <owl:equivalentClass> <owl:Restriction> <owl:onProperty rdf:resource="http://example.org/vocab#color"/> <owl:hasValue rdf:resource="http://example.org/vocab#red"/> </owl:Restriction> </owl:equivalentClass> </owl:Class> the generated RDF Graphs will be different (the whole construction for Lists will not be there) but, I believe, descriptorset_2_ivan and descriptorset_2 will be equivalent in the sense that the instances of those classes will be identical. Will I be POWDER compliant if I do that? Ivan -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Monday, 14 July 2008 14:32:27 UTC