- From: KANZAKI Masahide <mkanzaki@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 12:19:25 +0900
- To: public-powderwg@w3.org
Hi, In POWDER-S examples of powder-dr document, all classes that define IRI-set/Descriptor-set are denoted by rdf:nodeID, while class descriptions that add additional information to those sets are denoted by rdf:about/rdf:resource. eg: <owl:Class rdf:nodeID="iriset_1"> ... </owl:Class> <owl:Class rdf:nodeID="descriptorset_1"> ... </owl:Class> <owl:Class rdf:about="#iriset_1"> <rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="#descriptorset_1"/> </owl:Class> This does not make any meaningful relationship between those sets. I wonder, set definitions should be denoted by rdf:ID (not nodeID), or additional descriptions should refer those sets with rdf:nodeID (not rdf:about/rdf:resource). In case of reference across different files, rdf:nodeID doesn't work. Please make sure that rdf:nodeID is used for a blank node, while rdf:about/rdf:resource is for a node with URI. (and, I guess "#description_1" etc in Example 2-7 are typo of "#descriptorset_1" ...) best regards, -- @prefix : <http://www.kanzaki.com/ns/sig#> . <> :from [:name "KANZAKI Masahide"; :nick "masaka"; :email "mkanzaki@gmail.com"].
Received on Thursday, 3 July 2008 03:20:01 UTC