- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:32:38 +0000
- To: public-powderwg@w3.org
I am less than convinced by this thread. Independently of the operational vs RDF usage, there is a 'how do we find the relevant DR' problem. If we find the DRs using a link (either a link element, or a link header) then there is no need for the cascade. If we find the DR by some other means then the question is what to do if it is wrong. If I find the DR by some other means, then how do I find the rest of the cascade to know it has been overwritten. So - I am not clear what problem this thread is addressing. I think we have much of the use-case defined: a web site that is general child-safe, but a single page that is not, e.g. a medical photograph of genitals. And the first question is how do we describe this. The second question is how does a powder agent find the descriptions in order to understand them. === Scenario A) an end user clicks on a link U and the powder agent has to find and apply all relevant trusted powder descriptions, this can involve dereferencing U Scenario B) an end user is doing a search and we want to process the uris in a database without dereferencing them. Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:33:09 UTC