- From: Phil Archer <phil@philarcher.org>
- Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 11:36:36 +0000
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- CC: public-powderwg <public-powderwg@w3.org>
Again, thanks Dan. I've separated out the two types of reference in my current working draft. There are rather few normative references - the ones you mention are all informative. Phil. Dan Connolly wrote: > Does POWDER formal semantics depend normatively on dublin > core, turtle, N3, etc.? It's not clear from > the references section. > http://www.w3.org/TR/powder-formal/#refs > > I suggest separating normative from informative > references. > -- Please note my new e-mail address. My ICRA/FOSI e-mail addresses no longer function (and I no longer work there!) Phil Archer w. http://philarcher.org/
Received on Wednesday, 3 December 2008 11:37:21 UTC