- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 18:36:21 +0100
- To: Phil Archer <phil@philarcher.org>
- Cc: ietf-types@iana.org, Public POWDER <public-powderwg@w3.org>
* Phil Archer wrote: >On behalf of the W3C POWDER Working Group I have have today submitted >two registration requests for Media Types. As cited in those requests, >the key documentation is section 4 of Protocol for Web Description >Resources (POWDER): Description Resources [1]. Although this is formally >published as a working draft, we are close to reaching our Candidate >Recommendation exit criteria and therefore expect to seek transition to >Proposed Recommendation later this month. >[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/powder-dr/#assoc As per RFC 4288 As stated previously, standards tree registrations for media types defined in documents produced by other standards bodies MUST be described by a formal standards specification produced by that body. Such specifications MUST contain an appropriate media type registration template taken from Section 10. I could not find such a template in the document. Also, given that some http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#xml-media-types in the W3C think In general, a representation provider SHOULD NOT assign Internet media types beginning with "text/" to XML representations. A registration request for text/powder+xml from the W3C should not come without some form of justification for this choice. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Tuesday, 2 December 2008 17:36:59 UTC