- From: Andrea Perego <andrea.perego@uninsubria.it>
- Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 12:13:34 +0100
- CC: public-powderwg@w3.org
Hi, Phil. > Basically I see rules as a way to interpret DRs, rather than a way to > express them. Yes, they can be used for both purposes. In order to use a reasoner supporting, say, N3 rules (like Cwm), to process DRs, you should do what follows: 1. specify a set of rules which explicitly state which is the semantics of a DR 2. specify a set of rules which translate DRs into rules, based on the results obtained by the rules at point 1 3. specify a set of rules which process DRs based on the results obtained by the rules at points 1 and 2 The only problem I see in your sample rule is that it asks to "put an hyperlink." Well, it depends on what you mean. Take into account that the results of a reasoner are a set of (RDF/OWL) statements (i.e., you cannot modify HTML code). Anyway, we'll have time to discuss about this later, after having decided the new DR representation. Andrea
Received on Friday, 23 November 2007 11:09:23 UTC