Re: Aligning grouping of resources in POWDER and WAF Access Control.

Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 20:29:42 +0200, Jonas Sicking <> wrote:
>>>  OK, forget the ? notation. Your examples are very clear and we seem 
>>> in full alignment that <> includes sub domains but <*> 
>>> wouldn't include itself.
>> Sounds great. What do other people think of switching to this syntax? 
>> The difference from the current spec would be to change
> The only slightly confusing thing is that <> also matches 
> <> but I suppose that's ok.

Yeah, I agree, but given all other alternatives I think this is better. 
If for example someone does

CAC: allow <*> exclude <>

is most likely useless since the owners of are the same 
ones as So it's not unlikely that the rule can be easily 

It's not ideal, but it's the least bad suggestion yet IMHO.

/ Jonas

Received on Wednesday, 25 July 2007 20:50:57 UTC