RE: Open Issues: DR scope

> It is not clear to me why you're using here rdf:ID as an attribute to
rdfs:subclassOf.

Well spotted  - I meant rdf:resource :)

Cheers
Kevin

-----Original Message-----
From: public-powderwg-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-powderwg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Andrea Perego
Sent: 06 December 2007 13:23
To: Public POWDER
Subject: Re: Open Issues: DR scope


Hi, Kevin.

> What puzzles me is the need for owl:equivalentClass, and
rdfs:subClassOf
> (without an rdf:resource). My (admittedly poor) understanding was that
> using equivalentClass you would have:
> 
> 1  <owl:Class rdf:ID="ResourceOnExampleDotOrg">
> 2    <owl:equivalentClass>
> 3        <owl:Restriction>
> 4            <owl:onProperty rdf:resource="&wdr;includeHost" />
> 5            <owl:hasValue>example.org</owl:hasValue>
> 6          </owl:Restriction>
> 7   </owl:equivalentClass>
> 8 </owl:Class> 
> 
> (ref [1])

Thanks for pointing this out. I've just "indirectly" replied to your
mail by answering to Stasinos's one.

> ...and that if you used subClassOf you would do something like (note
> insertion of rdf:ID="AllResources"):
> 
> 1  <owl:Class rdf:ID="ResourceOnExampleDotOrg">
> 4    <rdfs:subClassOf rdf:ID="AllResources">
> 5       <owl:Restriction>
> 6         <owl:onProperty rdf:resource="&wdr;includeHost" />
> 7          <owl:hasValue>example.org</owl:hasValue>
> 8         </owl:Restriction>
> 9    </rdfs:subClassOf>
> 12 </owl:Class>
> 
> (ref [2])



Thanks

Andrea

Received on Thursday, 6 December 2007 13:23:25 UTC