- From: Kjetil Kjernsmo <kjetilk@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 12:54:37 +0200
- To: "Undisclosed.Recipients": ;
- Cc: public-powderwg@w3.org
On Friday 13 April 2007 18:15, Phil Archer wrote: > This looks terrific. Good! > Two things to say in quick response (OK, so it's > 26 hours since you posted this but you know what I mean...) Yes, I do! :-) > Others have raised the issue of including/supporting/linking POWDER > and tags. Clearly it's something we should do so I'm delighted that > you're already doing it! Yup! There is a bit of discussing that needs doing, and the main problem might be a SKOS thing. > Secondly - when I get round to it?? You think I don't have a > vocabulary for describing nudity? Oh yes, I know you have! But do you have what we have referred to as a description? Or are you saying that I could simply go: <http://my.opera.com/username/tag/nude> ex:means <http://www.icra.org/rdfs/vocabularyv03#nx> . Cheers, Kjetil -- Kjetil Kjernsmo Semantic Web Specialist Opera Software ASA
Received on Monday, 16 April 2007 10:54:42 UTC