- From: Raj Singh <rsingh@opengeospatial.org>
- Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 14:04:22 -0400
- To: roBman@mob-labs.com
- Cc: "public-poiwg@w3.org" <public-poiwg@w3.org>
On Sep 29, at 7:09 AM, Rob Manson wrote: > Hey Raj, > > the xml looks like a great example...here's a couple of small questions. > > Was the first attribute on the description element for the first poi > meant to be called "id" instead of "author"? No. I wanted to specify the author, but I'm having trouble figuring out how to represent it. See: http://rajsingh.org/poiwg/poi_logan_2.xml > Is the <point><Point>...</Point></point> double nesting needed? Yes. Everything in <Point> is straight from GML 3.3. And the double-nesting will be useful. For one, it will avoid the problem with <description> above, where you don't want to mix CDATA with an element. I.e. it's easy to slip an <author> element in as a child of <point> without messing with the location specification in <Point>. Why the <posList> element? I'm not sure, but greater GML minds than mine chose that as the most compact encoding, so there must be a good reason. I also realize that having srsName on <point> is now illegal in the data model, so it's moved to <Point> > And should the bottom "author" also have a type="text/directory" > added...I think that's the right mime-type for vCards. Thanks. That's a good enhancement. I've updated it in: http://rajsingh.org/poiwg/poi_logan_2.xml > > > roBman > > > On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 00:24 -0400, Raj Singh wrote: >> I've made some major edits based on the last couple weeks: >> http://www.w3.org/2010/POI/wiki/Data_Model >> >> and posted an example XML file: >> http://rajsingh.org/poiwg/poi_logan_1.xml >> >> --- >> Raj >> The OGC: Making location count... >> http://www.opengeospatial.org/contact >> >> >> > >
Received on Thursday, 29 September 2011 18:04:46 UTC