- From: Raj Singh <rsingh@opengeospatial.org>
- Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 12:53:53 -0400
- To: Mike Liebhold <mnl@well.com>
- Cc: "public-poiwg@w3.org W3C" <public-poiwg@w3.org>
Hi Mike. Long time no see! The group has been focused on a core, least common denominator, POI encoding. I think accuracy would be defined in an optional extension. I think the CRS used implies a level of accuracy, But since we adopted GML geometry, I bet with some research we could get explicit accuracy information right into the Point, LineString and SimplePolygon elements, but the work hasn't been done yet. --- Raj The OGC: Making location count... http://www.opengeospatial.org/ogc/organization/staff/rsingh On Oct 31, at 7:37 PM, Mike Liebhold wrote: > Very sorry to jump in so late in the dialog. ( i've been buried elsewhere) > > But, I have a couple of quick questions about the core data model: > > Besides latitude, longitude and altitude attributes of position, What has been decided about yaw, pitch and roll? > > Can someone tell me if i'm correct in assuming that the nominal CRS would allow for a designation of the accuracy of the position. ( I"m seeing the emergence of use cases requiring millimeter accurate positioning) > > Many thanks, > > Mike Liebhold > >
Received on Tuesday, 1 November 2011 16:54:28 UTC