- From: Thomas Wrobel <darkflame@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 00:20:50 +0200
- To: public-poiwg@w3.org
Do we need this within the POI itself? The data source distributing the POIs could give the dynamic properties itself - (in our case, we are streaming updates to clients, allowing POIs to move by their location co-ordinates been changed....actually a quite like a IRC bots work). Meanwhile if a webpage distributes a POI either PHP or Javascript could be used to create/manipulate it. I think a POI should be seen as just a way to position data - not as a source of manipulation itself. (ie, if we are thinking POIs should have "onclick" and such this, imho, is the wrong road - the item being positioned by the POI might have all manor of functionality, but the POI should really just be a data standard for the positioning). Animation meanwhile is easy - the data your linking too should be animated ;) (ie, a animated 3d mesh format) On 11 May 2011 22:43, Points of Interest Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: > > ISSUE-17 (dynamic-pois): How are POIs with dynamic properties represented? > > http://www.w3.org/2010/POI/track/issues/17 > > Raised by: Matt Womer > On product: > > From: roBman@mob-labs.com > Date: Tue May 03 06:17:01 2011 > Archived: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-poiwg/2011May/0004.html > > [[ > How would you see dynamic aspects like interaction, scripting and > animation being integrated into this data model? > > At the moment it's a completely static model with no scope I can see for > extension in this direction (except perhaps related to "time"). > ]] > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 11 May 2011 22:21:18 UTC