- From: Andy Mabbett <andy@pigsonthewing.org.uk>
- Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 22:31:01 +0000
- To: "public-poiwg@w3.org" <public-poiwg@w3.org>
On 16 March 2011 20:40, Thomas Wrobel <darkflame@gmail.com> wrote: > a default co-ordinate system while being able > to specify others That bit was me ;-) > However, I think it lacks any orientation specification which we would > need. So we could adopt the key/value pairs used here, but would need > to add additional ones as well. We could of course use the standard as > is, but include the additional data as separate fields - but that > would lead to more complex parsing. Or propose an amendment/ extension to that spec. [posted to "public-poiwg@w3.org" list only] -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
Received on Wednesday, 16 March 2011 22:32:58 UTC