- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 22:53:03 +0100
- To: "Seiler, Karl" <karl.seiler@navteq.com>
- CC: Andy Braun <ajbraun@gmail.com>, Roy Davies <roy.c.davies@flexstudio.co.nz>, Thomas Wrobel <darkflame@gmail.com>, "Hegde, Vinod" <vinod.hegde@deri.org>, "public-poiwg@w3.org" <public-poiwg@w3.org>, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
Seiler, Karl wrote: > I am beginning to feel like this is a recurring and circular discussion. Things (people, staplers, cars) have highly variable locations and places (a park, buildings, a store, a photo spot, a scenic drive) also have low volatility locations. > > Are we encompassing both or just places. What additional work or requirements are entailed by also considering a high degree of variance in location?
Received on Tuesday, 26 April 2011 21:54:40 UTC