- From: Andy Braun <ajbraun@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 17:19:45 -0400
- To: Roy Davies <roy.c.davies@flexstudio.co.nz>
- Cc: "Seiler, Karl" <karl.seiler@navteq.com>, "nathan@webr3.org" <nathan@webr3.org>, Thomas Wrobel <darkflame@gmail.com>, "Hegde, Vinod" <vinod.hegde@deri.org>, "public-poiwg@w3.org" <public-poiwg@w3.org>, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Message-ID: <BANLkTimpMCxBPjdni7voiS2+Cux535NiFA@mail.gmail.com>
In the case of a roving POI, the location is usable but often not a interesting piece of information. On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Roy Davies <roy.c.davies@flexstudio.co.nz>wrote: > Could not a POI be attached to a roving physical thing, however, like a > Taxi or Bus? I interpret POI as Point of Interest rather than Place of > Interest. And a Point of Interest could be attached to something that is > moving. Further, to me, a POI may be temporary, so be at a particular point > (or roving object) for only a certain period of time. > > /Roy. > -- > -------------------------------------------- > Dr. Roy C. Davies, The VR Guy. > -------------------------------------------- > Managing Director, LOOK-HERE IP Holdings Ltd. > Consultant and Managing Director, The Flexible Reality Studio Ltd. > Senior Research Fellow, VRSuite, CoLab, Auckland University of Technology > (AUT) > > EMAIL: roy.c.davies@ieee.org, roy.c.davies@flexstudio.co.nz, > roy.c.davies@aut.ac.nz, roycdavies@mac.com > > LINKEDIN: http://nz.linkedin.com/in/roycdavies > MYSPACE: http://www.myspace.com/roycdavies > FACEBOOK: http://www.facebook.com/roy.c.davies > TWITTER: http://twitter.com/roycdavies > > SKYPE: roycdavies > MSN: roy.c.davies@ieee.org > ICQ: 2557565 > YOUTUBE: drroycdavies > > PH: +64 (0)21 795294, +64 (0)9 8338360 > WEB: www.flexstudio.co.nz, www.look-here.info, www.humanitycomputer.org, > www.forwardthinking.org.nz, www.colab.org.nz > > On 27/04/2011, at 7:24 AM, Seiler, Karl wrote: > > If POI stands for Place-of-interest then by definition and scope/charter we > are defining the means to describe a place. > > Also, if we want to drop the idea of a Place-of-interest having an > “unknown” location, to keep from sliding sideways into descriptions of > concepts, then I am OK with that. > > _______________________________ > *Karl Seiler* > *Director Location Technology & Services*** > NAVTEQ - Chicago > (T) +312-894-7231 > (M) +312-375-5932 > www.navteq.com > > *From:* public-poiwg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-poiwg-request@w3.org] *On > Behalf Of *Andy Braun > *Sent:* Tuesday, April 26, 2011 2:09 PM > *To:* nathan@webr3.org > *Cc:* Thomas Wrobel; Hegde, Vinod; public-poiwg@w3.org; Dan Brickley > *Subject:* Re: Categorization + Whether a POI must have location > > My question about whether or not a POI must have a location comes down to > whether or not location is important. > > Take for example the "'66 Camaro", I can identify this point of interest > by its distinctive style. There is a great deal of interesting data > associated with this car. While I will not try to argue that this car has > no location, I would argue that its location isn't necessary to pull the > interesting data. > > > Andy > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote: > Thomas Wrobel wrote: > " to let users create POIs for Art of Computer Programming, Easter > ,The Social Network " > > No, because they arnt POIs. > We arnt trying to make a database of all concepts here. (Thats what > Linked data is for, theres already plenty of databases forming for all > sorts of conceptual things; > http://www.schemaweb.info/schema/BrowseSchema.aspx has a few) > > +1, fully agree. > > > A POI could have a category, but that doesn't mean all categories are POIs. > > > have a category, or be a category? > > > "Can users create these POI’s with location as unknown.?" > > I hope not, to me that seems exactly like making a "href" in html > without pointing it anywhere - its meaningless. > I vote strongly for POIs needing a location (of some form) in order to > be valid. > > > agree, a specific point, a region or a path - pretty much a usefully > constrained subset of the OpenGIS concepts. > > on that note, the main questions I'd raise are: > > a - support for real world locations only? > b - any spatial world, real or not? > c - coordinates for space, relating to say planets or satellites? > > (gut instinct says only a). > > Following on from that, define abstract datatypes and certain lexical forms > to be used in say XML and JSON or RDF. > > Following on from that, perhaps a schema for the properties, defined in > RDF, XML-Schema and JSON-Schema. > > If this WG did all of that (even though I'm only on the outskirts and have > no knowledge other than the charter and browsing a few mails), it'd be a > great addition to the web, IMHO. > > Unsure: > - any need for a specific scheme to encode locations in a URI form? If so, > new scheme or data: or using some fragments form like media fragments did? > > All the Best, > > Nathan > > > To me a POI should, essentially, be a physical hyperlink - a way to > link the real and virtual worlds together in some form. > > -Thomas > > > ~~~~~~ > Reviews of anything, by anyone; > www.rateoholic.co.uk > Please try out my new site and give feedback :) > > > > On 20 April 2011 16:32, Hegde, Vinod <vinod.hegde@deri.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Once we use some real world categorization schema as defined in say > Wikipedia, it lets us define categories for almost all the ‘entities’ we > know. > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Art_of_Computer_Programming Categories it > belongs to : 1968 books | 1969 books | 1973 books | 1981 books | Computer > books | Computer programming | Computer science > books | Algorithms | Analysis of algorithms | Monographs | Books by Donald > Knuth | Addison-Wesley books It HAS NO LOCATION > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Easter Categories it belongs to : > Easter | Christian holidays | Holy Week It HAS NO LOCATION > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Social_Network Categories it belongs to: > 2010 films | American films | English-language films | Facebook | 2010s > drama films | American biographical films | American business > films |American legal drama films | Courtroom dramas | Films whose writer > won the Best Adapted Screenplay Academy Award | Best Original Music Score > Academy Award winners | Films whose editor won the Best Film Editing > Academy > Award | Films directed by David Fincher | Films about technology | Films > about the media | Films about fraternities and sororities | Films based on > non-fiction books | Films set in California | Films set in > Massachusetts | Films set in 2003 | Films set in 2004 | Films set in > 2005 | Films shot digitally | Films shot in California | Films shot in > Massachusetts | Nonlinear narrative films | Relativity Media > films | Columbia Pictures films It HAS NO LOCATION > > > > My concern was whether we are going to let users create POIs for Art of > Computer Programming, Easter ,The Social Network and millions of such ‘real > world’ entities( for which we can identify some category in Wikipedia but > the entity itself has no location). > > > > That is are we going to let users create POIs belonging to categories which > do not support location in their semantics.? > > Can users create these POI’s with location as unknown.? > > > > > > > > Vinod > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > The information contained in this communication may be CONFIDENTIAL and is > intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not > the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is > strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, > please notify the sender and delete/destroy the original message and any > copy of it from your computer or paper files. > > >
Received on Tuesday, 26 April 2011 21:20:14 UTC