- From: Christine Perey <cperey@perey.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 16:39:54 +0100
- To: jacques lemordant <jacques.lemordant@inria.fr>
- CC: "Public POI @ W3C" <public-poiwg@w3.org>
Hi Jacques, Yes, as long as it is for testing the data model. I got distracted by the systems/tools :-) I see your point! Thank you, Christine Spime Wrangler cperey@perey.com mobile (until Dec 7) +86 132 6171 6195 VoIP (rings in Beijing) +1 (617) 848-8159 Skype Christine_Perey On 11/15/2010 4:35 PM, jacques lemordant wrote: > Hi Christine, >> I think that collaborative AR use cases are interesting, but unless it is revised, are beyond the scope of the POI WG charter. > I read carefully the scope of the POI WG charter and could not understand while collaborative AR will be not allowed as a USE case? > > Collaborative AR wil help us to correctly define time attributes for a POI data model. > > It implies that the POI data model to have some attributes to specify the frequency at which pooling must be done by the AR browser > (because a remote expert is changing the POIs data at some known frequency) > > As we are concerned only by the POIs data model and not the tools for collaborative AR, this USE Case will not drive the POI WG off the tracks > > Commercial AR advertising is very similar to collaborative AR with a marketing guy changing the POIs data in realtime > > They are both an example of Realtime AR .... > > jacques > > > >
Received on Monday, 15 November 2010 15:40:38 UTC