- From: Thomas Wrobel <darkflame@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 16:29:38 +0100
- To: Whan-kyu Kim <ipapaya2@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-poiwg@w3.org
This is a good point, but seems closely related to the time specification itself. If we can specify a range of time for a POI's existence, then the scenario of an old building/new building in the same place can just be dealt with by two or more separate POI's specifying the same location. I think this is a fairly simple solution. On 5 November 2010 03:12, Whan-kyu Kim <ipapaya2@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, I'm Will Kim from Ensoft. > I've contributed some documents in OMA, ARKR(Korean organization about AR). > I want to show some more use cases might be new use cases. > And I'm developing some AR based smartphone services. > > 1. There was an old building, but now a new building exists. > > 2. Inside the building new Italian restaurant is open. there was Indian > restaurant > > 3. Address of office can be changed > > I suggest there should be some historical data in POI. > > I think all physical object will be changing and moving. > > So I think a POI could have multiple historical information. > > What are differences between fixed and dynamic POIs? > > As a result, > > Data model would be changed if you agree with me: > > An anchor - centroids - data [from time, to time, centroid, description or > tag, direct unique id(?), etc] > > And there might be currentCentroid for easy access > Thanks for reading my use cases. > Will Kim > Vice President > Ensoft co., Ltd
Received on Friday, 5 November 2010 15:30:16 UTC